Performance Evaluation of Facilitated Transport Membranes Based on PEBA/Chitosan/Graphene Oxide for CO₂/N₂ Separation

Document Type : Research paper

Authors

Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Objective: The development of facilitated transport membranes often faces the challenge of reduced selectivity due to the increased free volume within the polymer matrix. The aim of this study is to investigate the distribution of unmodified graphene oxide (GO) and modified graphene oxide (M-GO) in a PEBA polymer matrix, as well as to evaluate the effect of surface-modified graphene oxide on improving the selectivity of PEBA/chitosan membranes.
Material and Methods: To prepare the facilitated transport membranes, graphene oxide was first dispersed in a water/ethanol solvent using an ultrasonic device. Then, 2 wt.% PEBA was dissolved in the prepared dispersion. Subsequently, a 1 wt.% chitosan solution was mixed with the homogeneous PEBA solution at a 1:1 ratio under magnetic stirring at room temperature.
The prepared membranes for investigation of the uniform distribution of filer in the polymer matrix by SEM and AFM tests and the interaction between filer and the polymer matrix were evaluated by FTIR. The CO2 permeation test was performed using constant pressure and variable volume.
Results: According to the SEM and AFM morphological and topological analyses, the membrane containing M-GO exhibited a smoother surface morphology compared to the one with unmodified GO. This improvement is attributed to better compatibility with the polymer chains and a more uniform dispersion within the membrane structure. The results indicated that membranes containing M-GO showed enhanced CO₂ permeability and CO₂/N₂ selectivity compared to those with unmodified GO.
Conclusion: Surface modification of M-GO, owing to stronger interfacial interactions through hydrogen bonding and improved interfacial compatibility between GO nanosheets and the polymer matrix, led to a 314% increase in CO₂/N₂ selectivity and a 440% improvement in CO₂ permeability.

Keywords

Main Subjects


 [1] Songolzadeh, M., Soleimani, M., Takht Ravanchi, M., & Songolzadeh, R. (2014). Carbon dioxide separation from flue gases: a technological review emphasizing reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. The Scientific World Journal2014(1), 828131. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/828131
 
[2] Lin, H., Van Wagner, E., Freeman, B. D., Toy, L. G., & Gupta, R. P. (2006). Plasticization-enhanced hydrogen purification using polymeric membranes. science311(5761), 639-642. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1118079
 
[3] Dautzenberg, F. M., & Mukherjee, M. (2001). Process intensification using multifunctional reactors. Chemical Engineering Science56(2), 251-267 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00228-1
 
[4] Vinoba, M., Bhagiyalakshmi, M., Alqaheem, Y., Alomair, A. A., Pérez, A., & Rana, M. S. (2017). Recent progress of fillers in mixed matrix membranes for CO2 separation: A review. Separation and Purification Technology188, 431-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.07.051
 
[5] Baker, R. W. (2023). Membrane technology and applications. John Wiley & Sons.
 
[6] Kenarsari, S. D., Yang, D., Jiang, G., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Russell, A. G., ... & Fan, M. (2013). Review of recent advances in carbon dioxide separation and capture. Rsc Advances3(45), 22739-22773. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA43965H
 
[7] Ho, M. T., Leamon, G., Allinson, G. W., & Wiley, D. E. (2006). Economics of CO2 and mixed gas geosequestration of flue gas using gas separation membranes. Industrial & engineering chemistry research45(8), 2546-2552. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050549c
 
[8] Bernardo, P., Drioli, E., & Golemme, G. (2009). Membrane gas separation: a review/state of the art. Industrial & engineering chemistry research48(10), 4638-4663. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie8019032
 
[9] Van Der Sluijs, J. P., Hendriks, C. A., & Blok, K. (1992). Feasibility of polymer membranes for carbon dioxide recovery from flue gases. Energy Conversion and Management33(5-8), 429-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-8904(92)90040-4
 
[10] Freeman, B. D., & Pinnau, I. (1999). Polymer membranes for gas and vapor separation (Vol. 733). Washington, DC, USA: American Chemical Society.
 
[11] Bondar, V. I., Freeman, B. D., & Pinnau, I. (2000). Gas transport properties of poly (ether‐b‐amide) segmented block copolymers. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics38(15), 2051-2062. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0488(20000801)38:15%3C2051::AID-POLB100%3E3.0.CO;2-D
 
[12] Bondar, V. I., Freeman, B. D., & Pinnau, I. (1999). Gas sorption and characterization of poly (ether‐b‐amide) segmented block copolymers. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics37(17), 2463-2475. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19990901)37:17%3C2463::AID-POLB18%3E3.0.CO;2-H
 
[13] Liu, S. L., Shao, L., Chua, M. L., Lau, C. H., Wang, H., & Quan, S. (2013). Recent progress in the design of advanced PEO-containing membranes for CO2 removal. Progress in Polymer Science38(7), 1089-1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.02.002
 
[14] Robeson, L. M. (1991). Correlation of separation factor versus permeability for polymeric membranes. Journal of membrane science62(2), 165-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(91)80060-J
 
[15] Yave, W., Car, A., & Peinemann, K. V. (2010). Nanostructured membrane material designed for carbon dioxide separation. Journal of Membrane Science350(1-2), 124-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.12.019
 
[16] Duan, K., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., & Liu, J. (2019). Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) functionalized mixed matrix membrane for effective CO2/N2 separation. Journal of Membrane Science572, 588-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.11.054
 
[17] Chung, T. S., Jiang, L. Y., Li, Y., & Kulprathipanja, S. (2007). Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising organic polymers with dispersed inorganic fillers for gas separation. Progress in polymer science32(4), 483-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.01.008
 
[18] Li, H., Song, Z., Zhang, X., Huang, Y., Li, S., Mao, Y., ... & Yu, M. (2013). Ultrathin, molecular-sieving graphene oxide membranes for selective hydrogen separation. Science342(6154), 95-98. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1236686
 
[19] Shen, J., Liu, G., Huang, K., Jin, W., Lee, K. R., & Xu, N. (2015). Membranes with fast and selective gas‐transport channels of laminar graphene oxide for efficient CO2 capture. Angewandte Chemie127(2), 588-592. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201409563
 
[20] Lee, H., Park, S. C., Roh, J. S., Moon, G. H., Shin, J. E., Kang, Y. S., & Park, H. B. (2017). Metal–organic frameworks grown on a porous planar template with an exceptionally high surface area: promising nanofiller platforms for CO2 separation. Journal of Materials Chemistry A5(43), 22500-22505. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA06049A
 
[21] Karunakaran, M., Shevate, R., Kumar, M., & Peinemann, K. V. (2015). CO 2-selective PEO–PBT (PolyActive™)/graphene oxide composite membranes. Chemical Communications51(75), 14187-14190. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC04999G
 
[22] Li, Y., Wang, S., He, G., Wu, H., Pan, F. & Jiang, Z.  (2015). Facilitated transport of small molecules and ions for energy-efficient membranes. Chemical Society Reviews, 44(1), 103-118.
 
[23] Huang, G., Isfahani, A., P. Muchtar, A., Sakurai, K., Shrestha, B. B. (2018). Pebax/ionic liquid modified graphene oxide mixed matrix membranes for enhanced CO2 capture. Journal of membrane science, 565 370-37.
 
[24] Li, X., Cheng, Y., Zhang, H., Wang, S., Jiang, Z., Guo, R. (2015). Efficient CO2 capture by functionalized graphene oxide nanosheets as fillers to fabricate multi-permselective mixed matrix membranes.  ACS applied materials & interfaces 7(9) 5528-5537.
 
[25] Shin, J., E. Lee, S., K. Cho, Y., H.  (2019). Effect of PEG-MEA and graphene oxide additives on the performance of Pebax® 1657 mixed matrix membranes for CO2 separation.  Journal of Membrane Science 572 300-308
 
[26] Kheirtalab, M., Abedini, R., & Ghorbani, M. (2024). Pebax/poly (vinyl alcohol) mixed matrix membrane incorporated by amine‐functionalized graphene oxide for CO 2 separation.  Journal of Polymer Science 62(3), 517-535. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.20230301