Feasibility study of using agglomeration method in heap leaching stage of copper oxidized ore by polymeric binder

Document Type : Research paper

Abstract

he most important factor in reducing the permeability of heap leaching, is the presence of fine particles which result in impermeable zones and channel streaming in the heap due to their movements along with the leaching agent in the aggregation areas. That’s why in Chahmousa copper mine, ore with 0-2 mm dimensions and with the copper grade of 1.34 %, could be separated before heap loading. In this research, in order to use the 0-2 mm fraction, the agglomeration method using inorganic compounds (sodium silicate, calcium sulfate) and non-ionic polymer compounds and cationic and anionic, is applied. The strength of bonding among particles is measured using soak test with fine migration parameter. Showing the least fine migration of 3.89%, based on the results, the most powerful bonding ties are agglomerates produced using non-ionic compounds. The reason for this increase in strength using non-ionic compounds is hydrogen bonding forces in which they are more effective aside with Van der Waals forces.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] D. W. Kappes (2005) Advances in Gold Ore Processing, Elsevier.
[2] W. J. Schlitt (1992) Solution mining: surface techniques, SME Mining Engineering Handbook, Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.
[3] N. Dhawan, M. S. Safarzadeh, J. D. Miller , M. S. Moats, and R. K. Rajamani (2013) “Crushed ore agglomeration and its control for heap leach operations”, Journal of Minerals Engineering, 41, 53-70.
[4] P. D. Chamberlin (1986) “Agglomeration: cheap insurance for good recovery when heap leaching gold and silver ores”, Journal of Mining Engineering, 38, 1105–1109.
[5] A. J. Garcia, and M. K. Jorgenson (1997) “Agglomeration and heap leaching testing requirements for high clay ores”, Colorado, USA.
[6] N. Dhawan, M. S. Safarzadeh, J.D. Miller, R.K. Rajamani, and M. Moats (2012) “Insights into heap leaching” Seattle, Washington, USA.
[7] K. A. Lewandowski, and S. K. Kawatra (2008) “Development of experimental procedures to analyze copper agglomerate stability”, Minerals and Metallurgical Processing, 25, 110–16.
[8] K. A. Lewandowski, and S. K. Kawatra (2009) “Polyacrylamide as an agglomeration additive for copper heap leaching”, International Journal of Mineral Processing, 91, 88–93.
[9] K. A. Lewandowski, and S. K. Kawatra (2009) “Binders for heap leaching agglomeration”, Minerals and Metallurgical Processing, 26, 1–24.
[10] S. K. Kawatra, T. C. Eisele, K. A. Lewandowski, and A. Gurtler (2006) Novel Binders and Methods for agglomeration of Ore, Michigan Technological University, Michigan, USA.
[11] W. Pietsch (2002) Agglomeration Processes, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim.
[12] J. B. Pautler, A. E. Gross,  and  , M. G. Strominger (1990) ‘‘New polymeric agglomeration aid improves heap leach efficiency at Brewer Gold.’’, Advances in Gold and Silver Processing, 2, 15–21.
[13] V. S. Green, and D. E. Stott (2001) ‘‘Polyacrylamide: a review of the use, effectiveness, and cost of a soil erosion control amendment.’’ 10th International Soil Conservation Organization meeting, Indiana, USA.
[14] M. S. Nasser, and A. E. James (2006) “The effect of polyacrylamide charge density and molecular weight on the flocculation and sedimentation behavior of kaolinite suspensions”, Separation and Purification Technology, 52, 241-252.
[15] L. T. Zhuravlev (2000) “The surface chemistry of amorphous silica. Zhuravlev model”, journal of Colloids and Surfaces, 173, 1-38.
[16]F. A. Andersen (2005) “Amended final report on the safety assessment of polyacrylamide and acrylamide residues in cosmetics.”, International journal of toxicology, 24, 21-50.
[17]A. Shipp, G. Lawrence, R. Gentry, T. McDonald, H. Bartow, and C. Van Landingham (2006) “Acrylamide: review of toxicity data and dose-response analyses for cancer and noncancer effects.”, CRC Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 36, 481-608.