Modeling and simulation of methanol reforming in palladium based membrane reactor on Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst for hydrogen production

Document Type : Research paper

Abstract

In this study the modelling and simulation of methanol steam reforming in a membrane reactor is investigated. The palladium based membrane with Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst are carried out as the model system for hydrogen production. For modelling a rigorous 2-dimensioanl mathematical model is considered and then the results of simulation are compared with the experimental data. The result shows a very good agreement between the simulation and experimental results with mean relative error of almost 8%. Furthermore, the influence of some effective parameters such as the pressure of retentate zone, steam to methanol ratio and sweep gas factor on the hydrogen selectivity were studied. The results perform that increasing of pressure from 1.5 to 2.5 bar can increase the selectivity about 3%. Also, increasing the ratio of water to methanol from 1 to 3 can increase the selectivity of hydrogen nearly 13%. Change in the sweep gas factor affects the hydrogen selectivity in the way that increasing of sweep gas factor up to 7 can increase the selectivity about 4.5%. Furthermore, the 2D concentration profile analysis for methanol concentration in the radial and axial directions has shown that the changes in the radial direction is negligible because of the small reactor diameter.
 

Main Subjects

References

[1]    G. Q. Lu, J. C. D. Da Costa, M. Duke, S. Giessler, R. Socolow, R. H. Williams, and T. Kreutz )2007( “Inorganic membranes for hydrogen production and purification: a critical review and perspective,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 314, no. 2, pp. 589–603.
[2]    B. Lindström and L. J. Pettersson )2001( “Hydrogen generation by steam reforming of methanol over copper-based catalysts for fuel cell applications,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 923–933.
[3]    Y. Chen, Y. Wang, H. Xu, and G. Xiong, (2008) “Hydrogen production capacity of membrane reformer for methane steam reforming near practical working conditions,” J. Memb. Sci., vol. 322, no. 2, pp. 453–459.
[4]    M. De Falco, L. Marrelli, and G. laquaniello (2011) “Membrane reactors for hydrogen production processes,” London, England: Springer.
 [5]   M. P. Harold, B. Nair, and G. Kolios (2003) “Hydrogen generation in a Pd membrane fuel processor: assessment of methanol-based reaction systems,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 2551–2571.
 [6]   C. H. Fu and J. C. S. Wu (2007) “Mathematical simulation of hydrogen production via methanol steam reforming using double-jacketed membrane reactor,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 32, no. 18, pp. 4830–4839.
[7]    C. H. Fu and J. C. S. Wu (2008) “A transient study of double-jacketed membrane reactor via methanol steam reforming,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 33, no. 24, pp. 7435–7443.
[8]    A. Aghaie and A. Eliassi (2009) “modelling of methanol steam reforming catalytic reactor to produce hydrogen : determination of optimum condition,” in the 6th International Chemical Engineering Congress & Exhibition (IChEC 2009), Kish, Iran.
[9]    S. Sá, J. M. Sousa, and A. Mendes (2010) “Methanol steam reforming in a dual-bed membrane reactor for producing PEMFC grade hydrogen,” Catal. Today, vol. 156, no. 3, pp. 254–260.
[10]  B. A. Peppley, J. C. Amphlett, L. M. Kearns, and R. F. Mann (1999) “Methanol–steam reforming on Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts. Part 2. A comprehensive kinetic model,” Appl. Catal. A Gen., vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 31–49.
[11]  K. Ghasemzadeh, S. Liguori, P. Morrone, A. Iulianelli, V. Piemonte, A. A. Babaluo, and A. Basile (2013) “H2 production by low pressure methanol steam reforming in a dense Pd–Ag membrane reactor in co-current flow configuration: Experimental and modeling analysis,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 38, no. 36, pp. 16685–16697.
 
 
Journal of Separation Science and Engineering
Volume 8, Issue 2
January 0
Pages 67-74

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics